VDH is one of the most balanced and reasonable writers on this topic. See here and here.
It is a strange world isn't it? Hordes of rioting illegal aliens bear the flag of a country they have no intention of living in while demanding rights they are not entitled to from a country of which they are not citizens. And stupid liberals see nothing wrong with it. We are well on the way to the BSA: The Balkanized States of America.
All Related Posts (on one page) | Some Related Posts:
- Illegal Aliens and the Place of Polemic
- Undocumented Workers and Illegal Aliens
- Liberal Arguments Against Illegal Immigration
- Are Liberals Allergic to Common Sense?
- Teddy Boy Logic: Confusing Illegal Immigration with Civil Rights
- Illegal Immigration and Public Health
- More On the Catholic Bishops on Illegal Immigration
- Immigration, The Catholic Bishops, and the Misuse of Scripture
- The Larger Context: The U.N.'s Anti-Sovereignty Agenda
- Mark Steyn on Immigration
- The Reconquista and the Reconquistadores
- Tammy Raises Cain with McCain
- Illegal Immigration and Avian Flu
- Illegal Immigration Links
- A Wall is the Key to Any Reform
- From the AFL-CIO Weblog
- AFL-CIO Supports Illegal Immigration!
- Victor Davis Hanson on Illegal Immigration

2. Disallowing comments from a particular person, or deleting an offensive, off-topic, or otherwise substandard comment, has nothing to do with censorship. People who think otherwise confuse censorship with lack of sponsorship. I am under an obligation not to interfere with anyone's exercise of legitimate free speech rights. But I am not under any obligation to aid and abet anyone's exercise of free speech rights, legitimate or illegitimate.
3. The Comments area is not an open forum for anyone to say anything about any topic. As the name implies, it is primarily for commenting on the author(s)' posts. But to comment on them, one must have read them. And if I have spent three hours on a post, a reader will not understand it in thirty seconds. Secondarily, the Comments area is to facilitate civil discussion between and among commenters as long as the discussion remains on-topic.
4. Some undesirables: The skimmers, those who cannot read but only read-in. The sophists who, abusing argument, argue for the sake of argument. The ideologues, those who are out for power, not truth. The uncivil. The illogical. The politically correct. Worst of all, perhaps, are those who exemplify the anti-Socratic property: those who think they know what they don't know. If Socrates was famous for his learned ignorance, these types are marked by their ignorant unlearnededness.