Many thanks to Gary Hartenburg for informing me of this exchange of correspondence between Daniel Dennett and Richard Swinburne.
I was pleased to see that Swinburne in his first response to Dennett alludes to the distinction between two senses of 'supernatural' -- a distinction I drew with some care in my first post on Dennett's new book.
All Related Posts (on one page) | Some Related Posts:
- Dennett Responds to Wieseltier
- An Exchange Between Daniel Dennett and Michael Ruse
- Dennett-Swinburne Exchange on Breaking the Spell
- Belief That, Belief In, Belief in Belief
- Lichtenberg on Dennett
- Dennett on the Deformation of the God Concept
- Burgess-Jackson on Leiter on Wieseltier on Dennett
- Dennett's Scientism Denounced in New York Times Book Review
- Religion as a Natural Phenomenon
- Problems with Dennett's Definition of Religion

2. Disallowing comments from a particular person, or deleting an offensive, off-topic, or otherwise substandard comment, has nothing to do with censorship. People who think otherwise confuse censorship with lack of sponsorship. I am under an obligation not to interfere with anyone's exercise of legitimate free speech rights. But I am not under any obligation to aid and abet anyone's exercise of free speech rights, legitimate or illegitimate.
3. The Comments area is not an open forum for anyone to say anything about any topic. As the name implies, it is primarily for commenting on the author(s)' posts. But to comment on them, one must have read them. And if I have spent three hours on a post, a reader will not understand it in thirty seconds. Secondarily, the Comments area is to facilitate civil discussion between and among commenters as long as the discussion remains on-topic.
4. Some undesirables: The skimmers, those who cannot read but only read-in. The sophists who, abusing argument, argue for the sake of argument. The ideologues, those who are out for power, not truth. The uncivil. The illogical. The politically correct. Worst of all, perhaps, are those who exemplify the anti-Socratic property: those who think they know what they don't know. If Socrates was famous for his learned ignorance, these types are marked by their ignorant unlearnededness.